Processing please wait ...
|
DK’s blasphemous propaganda against Iyyappan | |||
| Published on January 3rd, 2008 In Uncategorized, Blogging, Philosophy, Politics | Views 635 | ||||
|
The DK has again indulged in the blasphemous propaganda against the Iyyappan and related worship. In todays"s Viduthalai, an asdvertisement is appearing ( http://viduthalai.com/20080102/Page6.html) about the selling of handbills for the purpose. How they could target one particular Indian way of belief like that? Just within a week, New year has gone with all vulgarities; Christmas was celebrated; Bakrid with killing of camels, cattle and sheep; none cared. DK or Veeramani never came out with their critical analysis behind such festivals. They have never brought out any handbills and offered for sale. Why this type of exclusivist atheism, selective rationalism, partial anti-religiosity and so on? What makes them to be only anti-Hindu? Whether non-Hindus promote them or sponsor to do so? This is some what inexplicable psyche of the group and perhaps, we have to get an explanation for such behaviour. |
||||
| ||||
|
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
||||||||||||
Posted on January 3rd, 2008
What else can you expect from Dk? If some Iyyappan bakthars raise questions, they will go and attack some brahmins in the state. That is their level of acumen and intelligence. And these people call themselves rationalists and followers of “great” EVR?
Although I understand the idea behind your questions, my opinion is that we should leave other religions out of this issue unless we have conclusive proof that they sponsor this in some way. Will this handbill be okay with us even if they had distributed similar handbills on Jesus or Mohammed? - No! The explanation is that they thrive on keeping Hindus separate and it is purely for their own benefit although it works well for those who want to eradicate hinduism. But the focus should be on hinduism vs DK atheists (and supporting political parties) and not on hinduism vs christianity/islam. Sure, the handbill is despicable, but I hope no blood is shed on this account. This Govt will not act anything against such blasphemy but there is hope in TN. Other than DMK, many other major political parties do not suck up to DK rogues.
Posted on January 4th, 2008
1. I questioned exclusivist atheism, selective rationalism, partial anti-religiosity practiced by DK-DMK-PMK Black Parivar and Communists of all categories falling under Red Parivar.
2. In many gathrings - conferences, seminars, political meetings - they come together and talk nonsense. Note the Iftar and Christian functions organized (If you want I can give the details). The Mohammedans (now want to call them as Muslims) and Christians never object to such anti-God speech or attitude, because they know that these ideologists have been only against Hindu religion. They feel happy that Hindus is blasphemed as their Gods are left by the wonderful DK-DMK-Communists atheists and rationalists.
3. They never do that (handbills criticizing the non-Hindu festivals, ceremonies and belief-systems) - Just write to K. Veeramani to do so. Let the Periyar Suyamariyadhai Kazhagam and its other fronts with all printing facilities do that.
4. History of India, that too recent history, tells that all have been ganged up against Hindus. So why mince words. if they are not so, let them come out and prove their credentials.
5. See the concept of “eradication of Hinduism” coming to your mind. This is serious. When all have rights in this secular India, why the Hindus should be “eradicated”?
6. How such an idea comes?
7. You openly accept that, “This Govt will not act anything against such blasphemy but there is hope in TN” - this is again serious. The DMK government does not and cannot work only for non-Hindus and their rights. If they oppress and suppress Hindus like this, other Indians should take a serious note of it.
8. When we all talk about human-rights, woman-rights, children-rights, animal-rights etc., why not talk about their rights i.e, Hindu-rights?
9. If DMK acts in this ways, this is serious and as that is against the Indian Constitution and perhaps, some legal pundits should go into the details to remove such people from power.
10. As suggested, Indians / citizents of Tamilnadu need not wait for another politucal party. I think, any right-thnking paerson can defend the oppressed and suppressed Hindus of Tamilnadu.
Posted on January 5th, 2008
I am not questioning about hindu rights or anything like that. I am just saying it does not matter whether DK/ DMK is partially anti-religious. As long as they offend hinduism, hindus should oppose them, but focus your energy against DK rather than against christianity/islam. There are issues like forced mass conversion on which you can fault christianity and not for every idiotic action of DK.
If you had been following all the blogs here, a guy like gsuresh openly claims his goal is the eradication of hinduism. I am just saying such things come more from the mouth of DK/ DMK people rather than christians/ muslims.
Karunanudhi has abused hinduism and hindus like no other (contemporarily) and nothing has been done against him. So, the only alternative is to punish him by removing him from power and choose a party that will atleast safeguard the rights of hindus. Remember when karunanudhi abused rama, even the “literate” “original” people of tamilnadu saw it as an aryan vs dravidian issue, said things like rama is not their god, some person here even claimed here that while he worships muruga he doesn’t care about rama - all these people do not understand even the basic tenets of our religion, doesn’t understand that if rama can be abused, so can be muruga or even iyyappan which is what DK has done now.
Posted on January 28th, 2008
I am sorry that I have not seen your response.
You have raised an important point that certain “Hindus” accept “Muruga” as their “God”, but not “Rama”.
I understand that in Mauritius, some Tamils claim that they are not “Hindus”, even though they worship “Muruga”.
If the “Hindus” do not understand the basic tenets of their religion, then it is right time that they should be made to understand their religion.
The criticism of non-Hindu religion being to make Hindus aware about the lacuna in those religions, as generally, they think that their religion alone has “such weaknesses” and so on.
Believers of every religion believe according to their understanding of their religion. So if anybodyelse, as a believer or non-believer tries to wage war against any other religion, or decides to attack one particular religion, it is evident that he is an ideologist-psycho.
Karunanidhi’s stand on Rama exposed his weakness, hypocrasy and duplicity. Many of his followers have understood his senile outburst. In fact, not only his wives advised him not to utter such words hereafter, even his close friends have also expressed their concern.
With “Aryan-Dravidian” hypotheses and theories, he cannot carry out his business.
About | Content providers | Support | Beta feedback | Report abuse | Contact us | Careers | FAQ