|
NEW DELHI: An Indian princess is kidnapped, sold in the slave market and ferried across the seas to serve as a slave in Mexico — but becomes a source of veneration and is almost beatified as a saint.
This is not fiction. This is the story of Princess Meera, alias Catharina de San Juan alias China Poblana, one of those unfortunate Indians to be enslaved and taken abroad more than three centuries before India gained independence. It was when Spanish conquistadors and Portuguese sailors ruled the seas.
Hundreds of thousands of Indians were transported overseas by the Dutch, French, Portuguese and English colonialists, to work in sugar farms, tea gardens and elsewhere, where they remained to become the 20-million strong Indian diaspora spread across 110 countries.
Meera"s story, compiled from three hagiographic treatises written by Jesuit priests determined to beatify her, is part of 14 articles by prominent historians, philosophers, anthropologists and scientists from India and Mexico in a book India-Mexico - Similarities and encounters throughout history .
The book, edited by Eva Alexandra Uchmany of the National Autonomous University of Mexico, has published the Indian Council of Cultural Relations (ICCR) and highlights the fascinating similarities between India and Mexico. The two countries are situated on opposite ends of the globe and inheritors of “prosperous and autonomous civilizations".
The article on Meera — “la China Poblana: Indian princess, slave, married yet virgin, beatified yet condemned" — is by Augustin Grajales Porras of the Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities Meritorius University of Puebla.
Translated into English, la China Poblana means the Chinese girl of Puebla, but the author says the term “China" does not refer to continental China, but to the Philippines. “In fact, whatever came from the Orient received the generic name of Chinese."
Meera"s heart-rending story, as narrated by her to her Jesuit confessors, traces her origin “in some place in Rajasthan and probably also in Gujarat… in the bosom of a princely family".
“For her part, Meera remembers that her father was the lord of a certain principality, and, besides, a physician and seer, who knew how to quieten the tempests. In these remembrances of hers, distant and blurred, Meera categorises her parent as much as belonging to the ruling caste or Kshatirya or to that of the priests or Brahmins."
One day, as a 11 or 12-year-old, Meera was walking with her brother, when they were kidnapped by a band of pirates, who set sail “towards Cochin, on the Malabar coast, a city where the Portuguese had a pepper factory and a fort", and where she was sold as a slave.
In Cochin, she was evangelised and baptised by the Jesuits, who gave her a Christian name.
“The name given to me at the baptismal font was Catharina de San Joan," she told in her confession to Father Jose del Castillo Graxeda many years later.
After her stay in Cochin, her captors took her to various ports and finally to Manila. She had to endure mistreatment and was subjected to “cruel imprisonment".
But it was in Manila that her first encounter with “Divine Father" took place. While taking part in a procession of penitents, carrying crosses on their shoulders, she saw an image of “Jesus of Nazareth and she heard a voice telling her: ‘I will be your Father"". She had several similar visions later in life.
She arrived in Acapulco in May 1621, with several slaves and was bought by a rich merchant in Puebla, where she lived the rest of her hard life and died at the age of 82.
Though she married a fellow slave it was on the condition of “separation of beds with pillows and crucifixes". Finally, her husband left in frustration, but her confessors considered her “sacred vow of chastity" as another proof of her saintliness.
“The relationship between her and Domingo gave again a cause to Fathers Graxeda and Ramos, her confessors and biographers, so that they could add fresh arguments on the predestined beatitude and virtuosity of Meera alias Catharina de San Juan."
Catharina died a slave in 1688 after endless suffering. “At the hour of her death she was nearly paralytic because she suffered from respiratory complications and at the same time she was ridden by other diseases. The diseases were as much due to her age as because of her unfortunate difficult existence.
“The bells of the College of the Holy Spirit of the Company of Jesus announced emphatically the death of Catharina de San Juan, the news travelling by word of mouth.
“Such a large number of people arrive that four streets were crammed and the guards could not prevent the doors, panels and latches from being broken."
Latin inscriptions on her tomb preserved to this date state: “To the all-powerful supreme God. This sepulchre contains the venerable in Christ Virgin Catharina de San Juan, who was given to the world by the land of the Mogor (land of Mughals, meaning India).
After having lived for 82 years, loved principally by God, and no less by men, humble and poor in slavery, although illustrious because of her royal blood, her death occurred, followed by great acclamation on the part of the people and the clergy, on the eve of the three Holy Kings, in the year 1688."
However, in 1691, the three books written by the Jesuits on her life were banned by the church, confiscated and burnt as being “useless, improbable, revelations, visions and apparitions, full of contradictions and improper, indecent and impetuous comparisons…with no more foundation than the vain credulity of the author".
Though she was not beatified, the town where she lived and died, Puebla de los Angeles, exchanged its name with China Poblana, her pet name, symbolising the contacts and encounters of New Spain with India. |
Posted on December 15th, 2007
Christianity is the most cruelest religion in this planet.
Go here
http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/cruelty/long.html
Cruelty and Violence in the Bible
Ye shall eat fat till ye be full, and drink blood till ye be drunken, of my sacrifice which I have sacrificed for you.–Ezekiel 39:19
According to “Samuel,” David took a census of the people. This excited the wrath of Jehovah, and as a punishment he allowed David to choose seven years of famine, a flight of three months from pursuing enemies, or three days of pestilence. David, having confidence in God, chose the three days of pestilence; and thereupon, God, the compassionate, on account of the sin of David, killed seventy thousand innocent men. Under the same circumstances, what would a devil have done? — Robert Green Ingersoll, “About the Holy Bible” (1894)
Genesis
Because God liked Abel’s animal sacrifice more than Cain’s vegetables, Cain kills his brother Abel in a fit of religious jealousy. 4:8
God is angry. He decides to destroy all humans, beasts, creeping things, fowls, and “all flesh wherein there is breath of life.” He plans to drown them all. 6:7, 17
God repeats his intention to kill “every living substance … from off the face of the earth.” But why does God kill all the innocent animals? What had they done to deserve his wrath? It seems God never gets his fill of tormenting animals. 7:4
God drowns everything that breathes air. From newborn babies to koala bears — all creatures great and small, the Lord God drowned them all. 7:21-23
God tells Abram to kill some animals for him. The needless slaughter makes God feel better. 15:9-10
Hagar conceives, making Sarai jealous. Abram tells Sarai to do to Hagar whatever she wants. “And when Sarai dealt hardly with her, she fled.” 16:6
Lot refuses to give up his angels to the perverted mob, offering his two “virgin daughters” instead. He tells the bunch of angel rapers to “do unto them [his daughters] as is good in your eyes.” This is the same man that is called “just” and “righteous” in 2 Peter 2:7-8. 19:7-8
God kills everyone (men, women, children, infants, newborns) in Sodom and Gomorrah by raining “fire and brimstone from the Lord out of heaven.” Well, almost everyone — he spares the “just and righteous” Lot and his family. 19:24
Lot’s nameless wife looks back, and God turns her into a pillar of salt. 19:26
God threatens to kill Abimelech and his people for believing Abe’s lie. 20:3-7
Sarai tells Abraham to “cast out this bondwoman and her son.” God commands him to “hearken unto her voice.” So Abraham abandons Hagar and Ishmael, casting them out into the wilderness to die. 21:10-14
God orders Abraham to kill Isaac as a burnt offering. Abraham shows his love for God by his willingness to murder his son. But finally, just before Isaac’s throat is slit, God provides a goat to kill instead. 22:2-13
Abraham shows his willingness to kill his son for God. Only an evil God would ask a father to do that; only a bad father would be willing to do it. 22:10
Dinah, the daughter of Jacob, is “defiled” by a man who seems to love her dearly. Her brothers trick all of the men of the town and kill them (after first having them all circumcised), and then take their wives and children captive. 34:1-31
“The terror of God was upon the cities that were round about them.” 35:5
“And Er, Judah’s firstborn, was wicked in the sight of the Lord; and the Lord slew him.” What did Er do to elicit God’s wrath? The Bible doesn’t say. Maybe he picked up some sticks on Saturday. 38:7
After God killed Er, Judah tells Onan to “go in unto they brother’s wife.” But “Onan knew that the seed should not be his; and … when he went in unto his brother’s wife … he spilled it on the ground…. And the thing which he did displeased the Lord; wherefore he slew him also.” This lovely Bible story is seldom read in Sunday School, but it is the basis of many Christian doctrines, including the condemnation of both masturbation and birth control. 38:8-10
After Judah pays Tamar for her services, he is told that she “played the harlot” and “is with child by whoredom.” When Judah hears this, he says, “Bring her forth, and let her be burnt.” 38:24
Joseph interprets the baker’s dream. He says that the pharaoh will cut off the baker’s head, and hang his headless body on a tree for the birds to eat. 40:19
Exodus
Posted on December 23rd, 2007
OK, but why such cruelty acts through the believers in the Indian context has to be studied.
The Indian Christians and as well as the preachers, that too coming from big-big universities, come here pose as harbingers of peace, bringing light to Indians, custodians of women rights, children rights etc.
How then they treated Indian women like this?
The happenings at Kerala Catholic Ashrams have been also alarming, but all secularists, moderates, humanrightwalas etc., have been keeping quite!
About | Content providers | Support | Beta feedback | Report abuse | Contact us | Careers | FAQ